News

The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) is updating its Corporate Net-Zero Standard, sparking debate over how best to align business action with climate science. Proposals to require carbon removals from 2030 mark a step forward, but questions remain about whether cumulative rather than annual targets deliver real capacity growth. Shifting electricity goals from “renewable” to “zero carbon” broadens options but raises concerns over scope, lifecycle emissions and the exclusion of bioenergy.

Why Bioenergy Needs a Seat at the SBTi Table

The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) is updating its Corporate Net-Zero Standard, sparking debate over how best to align business action with climate science. Proposals to require carbon removals from 2030 mark a step forward, but questions remain about whether cumulative rather than annual targets deliver real capacity growth. Shifting electricity goals from “renewable” to “zero carbon” broadens options but raises concerns over scope, lifecycle emissions and the exclusion of bioenergy.

Companies are integrating carbon dioxide removals (CDRs) into their broader business strategies – and those who act early stand to benefit the most.

Acting Early on Carbon Removals isn’t Just Good for the Planet – it’s Smart Business

For companies – especially in sectors like technology, aviation, and heavy industry – decarbonization is no longer a distant goal; it's a boardroom imperative. However, many face hard limits: soaring energy costs that can't be paused, supply chains that can’t be swapped overnight, and emissions that current technologies can’t yet eliminate.

That’s why companies are integrating carbon dioxide removals (CDRs) into their broader business strategies – and those who act early stand to benefit the most.

If we as the business community are to be successful in playing our role in solving the climate crisis, we need all options to have a seat at the table - including bioenergy.

Following the science: Why bioenergy needs a seat at the SBTi table

In March, SBTi launched a consultation on Version 2 of its Corporate Net-Zero Standard. The proposals are bold, and undoubtedly a step in the right direction to bring many areas of the standard more closely in line with the science. Of note, SBTi has shifted its position on carbon removals, requiring or recommending for businesses to include removals as part of their targets from 2030 onwards – paving the way for the scale up of the carbon removals industry. However, there are some areas that seem to take a step backwards, notably the use of cumulative instead of annual targets and the change from ‘zero carbon’ to ‘renewable energy’ targets.

Q&A: Demand secures US Beccs: Elimini's Fitzmaurice

Despite uncertainties in a shifting political landscape, high demand for renewable energy and carbon dioxide removals (CDR) in the US will ensure the viability of Elimini's future bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) projects, Elimini's president, Laurie Fitzmaurice told Argus. Elimini expects to announce 1-2 BECCS development sites in the US within the next couple of years, and Fitzmaurice expands on the primary sources of revenue for the prospective facilities and the potential offtakers for the power.